Easy Wisdom | PoliLegal

top of page

This site was designed with the

website builder. Create your website today.Start Now

#EasyWisdom by Amolika Sen What is feminism? Feminism is characterized by the belief that all genders should have equal rights and opportunities across all sectors, including social, economic, political, and cultural domains. It addresses gender inequality shaped by societal norms, gender identities, sexuality, and expression through political activism and applying social and contextual theories. The movement began by advocating for and advancing women’s rights and interests. With time, feminism evolved to include a broader assessment of how gender and sexuality are constructed socially and performatively. Feminism seeks to achieve gender equality not just in law but also in practice by attempting to put an end to sexual exploitation, sexism, and oppression. Historical Background The feminist movement began as a response to Western traditions that restricted women to the domestic sphere in the 19th century. Aimed at overturning social and legal inequalities, this movement took place in several waves, each comprising distinct goals. Although certain aspects of these waves tend to overlap, they are broadly characterized into four periods. The First Wave (1848-1920) The first wave of feminism began with the rapid industrialization and dissemination of liberal, socialist politics in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. With a focus on women’s suffrage, feminists of this period sought equal opportunities and rights for women in property ownership, education, and employment. However, this wave was led primarily by middle-class, cis-gendered, white women and did not include women who faced oppression based on the intersectional lines of race, class, and gender. The Second Wave (early 1960s - early 1980s) With an increasing awareness of self-consciousness in light of the civil rights movements during this period, the second wave emerged as a radical advocation of reproductive and sexuality rights. Feminists of this wave recognized the varied social, cultural, and political contexts that influenced women’s experiences of exploitation and suppression and initiated a concentrated effort to incorporate diverse sexualities, inclusivity, and intersectionality into the movement. The Third Wave (early 1990s – 2010s): This wave was significant in deconstructing and redefining social ideas transmitted in society and through media of gender, womanhood, femininity, masculinity, and sexuality. Gender identity and sexual liberation formed the primary focus of feminists of this period. The Fourth Wave (2013 – present) The development of modern communication technologies led to the emergence of the fourth wave of feminism. This wave sought to propagate activism through widespread online mobilization, focusing on key issues like sexual harassment and rape culture. This period has been marked by several significant campaigns, such as the #MeToo movement, which gained widespread attention in 2017 to support survivors of sexual abuse in the workplace. Comparison Learn More

Feminism Unfolded: Essence, Origin and Waves

3 September 2024

#EasyWisdom by Amolika Sen What is Fascism? Fascism, as a far-right political ideology, is characterized by a radically conservative and authoritarian form of government in which power is centralized in the hands of an individual. The state, under this ruler, exerts control over all aspects of public and private life. The fundamental feature of such a regime is the prioritization of the collective good of the state over individual rights and freedoms. Key Features This concentration of power suppresses any political dissent and extends its control beyond the political sphere into the social, economic, and cultural domains. The state heavily influences the media and educational systems to propagate a singular ideology. Certain societal groups are often singled out as enemies, which justifies systemic violence against them, while the leader is portrayed as a supreme figure or saviour of the nation. The military plays a significant role in achieving such suppression and glorification of ultranationalist values. Economically, a fascist government typically discourages foreign trade and business activities in favour of self-sufficiency and protectionism. Understanding through prominent historical examples Mussolini, Italy (1922-1943): Benito Mussolini founded the National Fascist Party in Italy and established an authoritarian regime without accountability to the legislature. Under him, the regime suppressed the free press, banned trade unions, and dissolved opposition parties, effectively stifling free speech. His administration adopted a racial ideology that emphasized the supremacy of the Italian race, and this was evident in Mussolini’s colonial policies, particularly in Africa. The invasion of Ethiopia from 1935 to 1936 was justified through racist rhetoric, and the Italian colonial administration employed harsh and discriminatory methods against the native population. Hitler, Germany (1933-1945): Adolf Hitler promoted National Socialism, framed as a radical departure from socialism and communism. An ideal German national community came to be defined along racial lines under his fascist regime. This vision involved uniting all ethnic Germans and excluding minorities who were deemed outside this national community, particularly Jews. The regime also focused on “ethnic cleansing” the German community by targeting supposed threats to it, culminating in the systematic extermination of the Jewish population during the Holocaust. Comparison Learn More

Understanding Fascism: Centralization, Ideology and Suppression

27 August 2024

#EasyWisdom by Mohit Kumar Manderna What is Neoliberalism? Neoliberalism is like a recipe for organizing society, focusing on free markets and limited government involvement. Imagine a playground where children (businesses) play freely with minimal adult (government) supervision. This philosophy gained popularity in the 1980s, championed by leaders like Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher . Key Principles 1. Free markets: Think of the economy as a giant farmer's market. Neoliberalism believes that if everyone is free to buy, sell, and trade as they wish, the market will naturally balance itself, leading to the best outcomes for all. Example: The deregulation of the airline industry in the U.S. in 1978 allowed new airlines to enter the market, increasing competition and often reducing prices for consumers. 2. Privatisation: This is like turning a public park into a private amusement park. Neoliberals argue that private ownership leads to better maintenance and more innovative attractions. Example: In the UK, Margaret Thatcher's government privatized many state-owned industries, including British Telecom and British Airways, in the 1980s. 3. Deregulation: Picture removing speed limits from highways. Neoliberals believe fewer rules allow businesses to operate more efficiently and innovatively. Example: The U.S. banking deregulation in the 1990s removed barriers between commercial and investment banking, leading to the creation of financial supermarkets like Citigroup. 4. Globalisation: Imagine the world as one big shopping mall where goods, services, and money can move freely between stores (countries). Example: The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994 reduced trade barriers between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Impact on Society 1. Economic landscape: Like a game of Monopoly, wealth has become concentrated among fewer players. 2. Public services: Schools and hospitals increasingly operate like businesses, focusing on efficiency and cost-cutting. 3. Labor market: Workers are seen more like independent contractors than long-term employees, with reduced job security and benefits. Criticisms and Debates Critics argue that neoliberalism has unintended consequences: 1. Inequality: The "rising tide" of economic growth hasn't lifted all boats equally. 2. Social welfare: Essential services may become less accessible when profit is the primary motive. 3. Economic instability: Reduced regulations can lead to risky behavior, as seen in the 2008 financial crisis. As global challenges like climate change and wealth disparity grow, the neoliberal "recipe" is being re-examined. Some argue for tweaks to the recipe, while others call for a completely new approach to organising our economic and social lives. Comparison Learn More

Neoliberalism Explained: The Free Market Recipe for Society | Easy Wisdom

7 July 2024

#EasyWisdom by Mohit Kumar Manderna What is Realpolitik? Realpolitik is a political approach that prioritizes practical considerations and power dynamics over moral or ideological principles. It's like playing chess on the global stage, where each move is calculated based on potential gains rather than what's morally right. Key Principles 1. Power is central: In Realpolitik, national power is the currency of international relations. It's similar to how money dictates options in the business world. 2. Pragmatism over idealism: Realpolitik favors achievable outcomes over lofty ideals. It's akin to choosing a reliable used car over an unaffordable luxury vehicle. 3. National interest first: Countries act primarily to protect and advance their own interests, much like individuals prioritize personal or family needs. Historical Context Realpolitik emerged in the 19th century, with Otto von Bismarck as a notable practitioner. Bismarck's unification of Germany exemplifies Realpolitik in action: He formed and broke alliances based on immediate needs rather than long-term loyalty. He provoked wars when it served Prussia's interests, then showed restraint to avoid alarming other powers. During the Cold War, both the US and USSR often employed Realpolitik: The US supported authoritarian regimes to prevent the spread of communism, prioritizing strategic interests over democratic ideals. The USSR invaded Afghanistan in 1979 to maintain its sphere of influence, disregarding international norms. Modern Applications Today, Realpolitik continues to shape international relations: China's Belt and Road Initiative: While presented as mutually beneficial, it's largely seen as a way for China to expand its global influence. US-Saudi relations: Despite human rights concerns, the US maintains close ties with Saudi Arabia due to strategic and economic interests. Criticisms Critics argue that Realpolitik can lead to: 1. Disregard for human rights: Like ignoring worker welfare for corporate profits. 2. Short-term thinking: Similar to overfishing for immediate gain, ignoring long-term sustainability. 3. Increased tensions: Pursuit of national interests without regard for others can escalate conflicts, like neighbours fighting over property lines. In essence, Realpolitik is about navigating the complex world of international relations with a focus on tangible results rather than abstract ideals. It's a pragmatic approach that, while often effective, can sometimes come at the cost of ethical considerations. Comparison Learn More

Realpolitik Explained: Pragmatic Power Politics in IR | Easy Wisdom

6 July 2024

#EasyWisdom by Mohit Kumar Manderna What is Totalitarianism? Totalitarianism is a form of government where the state has unlimited power and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life. It goes beyond mere dictatorship by extending its control to every part of society, including the economy, education, culture, and even people's thoughts and beliefs. Key Features of Totalitarianism 1. Centralised Control: One political party, often led by a single leader, holds all the power. There are no other political parties or significant opposition. 2. Ideology: The state promotes an official ideology that everyone is expected to follow. This ideology is used to justify the government's actions and policies. 3. Surveillance and Propaganda: The government uses mass media to spread propaganda and controls the information people receive. It also employs extensive surveillance to monitor and suppress any dissent. 4. Repression: Civil liberties are severely restricted. The government often uses violence, secret police, and arbitrary arrests to silence critics and opposition. 5. Control Over Economy and Society: The state directs economic activity and dictates social norms and behaviours. Private enterprise and personal freedoms are heavily restricted. Historical Examples Nazi Germany (1933-1945): Led by Adolf Hitler, the Nazi regime controlled almost every aspect of German life, promoting a racist ideology and using propaganda, censorship, and terror to maintain power. Soviet Union (1924-1953): Under Joseph Stalin, the USSR became a totalitarian state with a single-party rule, widespread use of secret police, and a rigid control over all aspects of life and the economy. North Korea (1948-present): The Kim dynasty has maintained strict control over the country through an intense cult of personality, propaganda, and repression of any opposition. Why It Matters? Understanding totalitarianism helps us recognize the importance of democracy and the protection of individual freedoms. By studying these regimes, we learn how to prevent such extreme concentrations of power in the future. In conclusion, totalitarianism is a system where the government seeks to control every part of life, leaving no room for personal freedom or dissent. By being aware of its characteristics and history, we can better appreciate the value of our own freedoms and work to protect them. Difference from similar concepts

Understanding Totalitarianism: Simplified & Explained | Easy Wisdom

16 June 2024

#EasyWisdom by Kritika Vatsa In political theory and international law, sovereignty has always been an intricate concept, shaping the governance and independence of nations. It refers to the ultimate authority or power within a state or nation and encompasses both internal and external autonomy for states. In practical terms, sovereignty refers to the supreme authority of a country to manage its own affairs without interference of others. The components of Sovereignty State Autonomy: Sovereign states have the right to govern themselves. This means they can create and enforce their own laws, manage their internal affairs, and make decisions without being influenced or controlled by external entities. State autonomy ensures that each country can maintain its distinct identity, cultural practices, and governance style, free from external domination or coercion. Recognition: When a state recognizes another state, it formally acknowledges that the entity meets the criteria of statehood (defined territory, permanent population, government, and the capacity to enter relations with other states). This acknowledgment affirms that the recognized state has the right to exercise authority within its borders without interference. This recognition forms the basis for diplomatic relations and treaties. International Law: Sovereign states interact with one another based on international law. Treaties, alliances, and agreements are formed keeping in mind the respect for each state’s sovereignty. Take the example of The Paris Agreement on climate change wherein countries commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Each country sets its own targets and strategies, respecting its sovereignty while contributing to a global effort. Is Sovereignty absolute? But it is important to note that sovereignty is not absolute. It is balanced with cooperation and mutual interests in international relations. While states govern themselves, they often give up on some autonomy to collaborate on global issues, such as trade and security, reflecting the interdependent nature of the modern states. For example, in the European Union, the member states maintain sovereignty but share certain powers and policies for economic integration, legal standards, and regional stability, demonstrating how cooperation complements sovereignty. Difference from similar concepts

Sovereignty Explained: The Core Concept in Politics and Law | Easy Wisdom

14 June 2024

#EasyWisdom by Mohit Kumar Manderna What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines the rightness or wrongness of actions based on their consequences. The core idea is that the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or utility. This theory is closely associated with the philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Key Principles of Utilitarianism 1. Consequentialism: The morality of an action is determined by its outcomes or consequences. Actions are judged solely based on their results. 2. Utility: Often defined in terms of happiness or pleasure versus suffering or pain. The goal is to maximize overall happiness and minimize suffering. 3. Greatest Happiness Principle: The best action is the one that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. 4. Impartiality: Everyone's happiness counts equally. The well-being of each individual is considered without bias. Types of Utilitarianism 1. Act Utilitarianism: Evaluates each action based on whether it produces the greatest happiness in a particular situation. It focuses on the immediate consequences of individual actions. 2. Rule Utilitarianism: Focuses on following rules that, in general, lead to the greatest good. Instead of evaluating individual actions, it assesses the long-term consequences of following certain rules of conduct. Criticisms of Utilitarianism 1. Impracticality: It can be difficult to accurately predict and measure all the consequences of an action. 2. Justice and Rights: Utilitarianism may justify actions that are intuitively unjust or violate individual rights if those actions maximize overall happiness. 3. Demandingness: The theory can be very demanding, requiring individuals to always act in ways that maximize overall happiness, potentially at significant personal cost. Examples of Utilitarian Thought 1. Policy Making: Utilitarian principles are often used in public policy and economics, where decisions aim to produce the greatest good for the greatest number.
2. Ethical Dilemmas: Utilitarianism is frequently applied to ethical dilemmas, such as deciding whether to sacrifice one person to save many others. In summary, utilitarianism is a consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates the morality of actions based on their ability to produce the maximum overall happiness. While it offers a clear and straightforward way to make ethical decisions, it also faces significant criticisms regarding its practical application and potential conflicts with justice and individual rights. The trolley problem Now, let's look at the trolley problem: Imagine a trolley is heading towards five people tied up on the tracks. You have the option to pull a lever and divert the trolley onto a different track where there is only one person tied up. In this situation, a utilitarian would argue that the right decision is to pull the lever to save the five people, even though it means sacrificing the one person. This is because in this scenario, saving the greater number of people brings the most overall happiness or good. So, in simple terms, utilitarianism in the trolley problem would suggest choosing the option that results in the greatest good for the greatest number of people, even if it involves making a tough decision to sacrifice a smaller number of people. Difference from similar concepts Learn More about Utilitarianism and its connection with Justice:

Utilitarianism Explained: Should I pull the lever? | Easy Wisdom

8 June 2024

bottom of page